🔐 CVE Alert

CVE-2026-96618

UNKNOWN 0.0

Hex exhausts memory and disk on oversized or compressed responses from an untrusted mirror

CVSS Score
0.0
EPSS Score
0.0%
EPSS Percentile
0th

Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) vulnerability in hexpm hex allows an untrusted package mirror to exhaust the memory or disk space of the machine running mix deps.get, mix deps.update, mix hex.package fetch or mix hex.docs fetch. Hex treats a mirror configured with HEX_MIRROR_URL, HEX_MIRROR or mirror_url as untrusted: it doesn't send credentials to it, and it checks registry signatures and package checksums that the mirror can't forge. Several response paths consume memory or disk in proportion to what the mirror sends before any of those checks run. Hex.HTTP.request/5 reads the whole response body into memory and decompresses it with :zlib.gunzip/1 whenever the response's Content-Encoding contains gzip, with no limit on the compressed or decompressed size. Hex doesn't ask for compressed responses, so the server decides whether this step runs. It applies to registry, package, docs and API responses. Package tarballs have no download size limit. Hex 2.5.1 holds the whole tarball in memory and writes it to the cache, and the development branch streams it to a temporary file; the 16 MiB tarball limit is checked only when the file is unpacked. The tarball is then unpacked, into deps/<app> in 2.5.1 and into a staging directory on the development branch, before its checksums are compared with the registry. mix hex.docs fetch, and mix hex.docs offline when docs are missing, write the docs tarball to disk and extract it with :mix_hex_erl_tar.extract/2 without the 16 MiB compressed and 128 MiB decompressed limits that mix_hex_tarball:unpack_docs/3 applies. The signed registry doesn't cover docs tarballs, so nothing checks them. Registry responses are also decompressed before their signature is checked, in hex_core code that Hex vendors; that part is tracked in https://github.com/hexpm/hex_core/security/advisories/GHSA-7c4r-cgf9-9jmq. This issue affects hex: from 0.11.2 before 2.5.2.

CWE CWE-409 CWE-770
Vendor hexpm
Product hex
Published Oct 12, 2026
Stay Ahead of the Next One

Get instant alerts for hexpm hex

Be the first to know when new unknown vulnerabilities affecting hexpm hex are published — delivered to Slack, Telegram or Discord.

Get Free Alerts → Free · No credit card · 60 sec setup

Affected Versions

hexpm / hex
0.11.2 < 2.5.2
hexpm / hex
51ea632424fb6ea8765148f96dc25dfeb526b1f8 < *

References

NVD ↗ CVE.org ↗ EPSS Data ↗
github.com: https://github.com/hexpm/hex/security/advisories/GHSA-gf42-pg2f-63jp cna.erlef.org: https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-96618.html osv.dev: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-96618 github.com: https://github.com/hexpm/hex/commit/51ea632424fb6ea8765148f96dc25dfeb526b1f8 github.com: https://github.com/hexpm/hex/commit/bb5189eade682c5fc3f98d9725973a7beb4e1deb github.com: https://github.com/hexpm/hex/commit/08956100a8283ba500a123e5539ac64d5d7e91d8

Credits

Peter Ullrich Eric Meadows-Jönsson Jonatan Männchen / EEF